State v. Mattic

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• directing that counsel’s “bare statement” to the trial court was unavailing, and that “‘a very strong showing is required to prove abuse of . . . discretion; the party requesting continuance [in light of the State’s request to amend information] must show prejudice.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).