Skip to main content

State v. Mathis

Citations

  • 2018 Ohio 4541

Syllabus

The trial court did not abuse its discretion when it denied appellant's presentence motion to withdraw his Alford plea. Further, the imposition of the costs of prosecution, confinement, and counsel was not contrary to law. Change of heart Crim.R. 11 Crim.R. 32.1 ability to pay.

Judges: Pietrykowski

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.