State v. Marvin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that under the 1980 Plea Withdrawal Statute, the court “will, however, entertain [a motion to withdraw a guilty plea] for the first time on appeal if plain error or exceptional circumstances exist”
• recognizing that under the 1980 Plea Withdrawal Statute, the court “will, however, entertain [a motion to withdraw a guilty plea] for the first time on appeal if plain error or exceptional circumstances exist”
• when defendant has burden of satisfying two-part test, \it is unnecessary for this court to apply both parts where our inquiry reveals that one of its parts is not satisfied\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Holgate
  Utah Supreme Court· 2000-09-19· cited 405×
• State v. Reyes
  Utah Supreme Court· 2002-01-25· cited 29×
• State v. Rettig
  Utah Supreme Court· 2017-11-21· cited 17×
• State v. Tryba
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 2000-07-28· cited 14×
• State v. Ostler
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 2000-02-10· cited 9×
• State v. Wright
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 2004-04-08· cited 7×
• State v. Perez-Avila
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 2006-02-24· cited 7×
• State v. Rettig
  Utah Supreme Court· 2017-11-22