Court of Appeals of Arizona· 7/26/1990

State v. Marty

Citations

801 P.2d 468
166 Ariz. 233
65 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 30
1990 Ariz. App. LEXIS 247

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“In Arizona, both ‘but for’ causation and proximate cause must be established in a criminal case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Grant, Jacobson, Lankford

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Steffensen v. Smith's Management Corp.
Court of Appeals of Utah· 1991-10-29· cited 74×
State v. Jansing
Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1996-03-28· cited 14×
Robertson v. Commonwealth
Kentucky Supreme Court· 2002-08-22· cited 12×
State of Arizona v. Hon. aragon/max Fontes
Arizona Supreme Court· 2022-03-21
State v. Dodd
Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2017-12-07

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.