Ohio Court of Appeals· 11/10/2021

State v. Martinez

Citations

2021 Ohio 3994

Syllabus

Appellant's separation of powers constitutional claim regarding sentencing is not ripe for review. Decision to not file a competency motion for evidentiary reasons was tactical and was not ineffective assistance of counsel. Case is remanded for resentencing due to the failure of the trial court to establish R.C. 2929.144 aggregate sentencing range.

Judges: Osowik

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

State v. Wright
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-05-06· cited 8×
State v. Croley
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-11-19· cited 2×
State v. Mitro
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-09-16
State v. Croley
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-12-16

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Strickland v. Washington
Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
North Carolina v. Alford
Supreme Court· 1970-11-23· cited 9,465×
State v. Hacker
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-10-26· cited 120×
State v. Guyton
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-07-27· cited 101×
State v. Ferguson
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-08-21· cited 100×
State v. Barnes
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-08-21· cited 55×
State v. Leet
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-09-25· cited 55×
State v. Maddox
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-09-30· cited 52×
State v. Rogers
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-08-17· cited 45×
State v. Morris
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-08-17· cited 24×
State v. Stenson
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-06-30· cited 20×
State v. Figley
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-07-30· cited 5×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.