State v. Martin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[S]eeing something in a suspected dealer’s hand cannot be the sine qua non of probable cause, any more than any other single fact.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Vasquez-Villagomez
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2009-02-26· cited 41×
• State v. Martin
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-01-02· cited 18×
• Powell v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2010-11-30· cited 17×
• State v. Huffman
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-10-14· cited 17×
• State v. Hammonds
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-09-02· cited 16×
• Ross v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2001-03-13· cited 14×
• State v. Crampton
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-08-15· cited 14×
• State v. Williams
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-11-14· cited 13×
• State v. Plummer
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-04-28· cited 4×
• State v. McKinney
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-05-02· cited 3×
• State v. McNutt
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-03-18· cited 3×
• State v. Lebanno
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-09-01· cited 1×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Bates
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1987-12-22· cited 243×
• State v. Martin
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1997-02-19· cited 6×