Skip to main content

State v. Martin

Citations

  • 403 S.C. 19
  • 742 S.E.2d 42
  • 2013 WL 1830932
  • 2013 S.C. App. LEXIS 139

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing evidence of evasive conduct may be admissible to show a defendant's consciousness of guilt
  • stating evidence of a defendant's flight is admissible to establish a guilty conscience when the flight was the product of a guilty conscience and the consciousness of guilt was related to the underlying crime of the defendant's charges
  • \Decisions concerning the admission of flight evidence are subject to a harmless error analysis.\
  • \This general rule applies to evidence of particular acts . . . .\
  • requiring \a nexus between the [conduct] and the offense charged\
  • requiring \a nexus between the [conduct] and the offense charged\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cureton, Konduros, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.