State v. Martin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It is well established that an officer’s reasonable articulable suspicion does not require proof beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant’s conduct has satisfied the elements of the offense.”
• “It is well established that an officer’s reasonable articulable suspicion does not require proof beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant’s conduct has satisfied the elements of the offense.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Braucher
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-03-07· cited 1×
• State v. Rodriguez
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-12-27

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Fanning
  Ohio Supreme Court· 1982-07-14· cited 2,064×
• State v. Bobo
  Ohio Supreme Court· 1988-06-15· cited 1,010×
• City of Dayton v. Erickson
  Ohio Supreme Court· 1996-07-03· cited 850×
• State v. Brooks
  Ohio Supreme Court· 1996-03-04· cited 426×
• State v. Mays
  Ohio Supreme Court· 2008-09-16· cited 383×
• United States v. Cecil Ferguson
  Sixth Circuit· 1993-11-01· cited 372×
• Dayton v. Erickson
  Ohio Supreme Court· 1996-07-03· cited 228×