State v. Martin
Citations
- 2019 Ohio 2047
Syllabus
Appellant's assertion that trial counsel did not present mitigating evidence of her prior substance abuse and mental health issues is not supported by the record, and therefore does not support her ineffective assistance of counsel argument. Trial court properly considered this mitigating evidence, as well as the principles and purposes of sentencing under R.C. 2929.11 and the seriousness and recidivism factors under R.C. 2929.12.
Judges: Zmuda
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court· 2003-06-26· cited 5,961×
- State v. HunterOhio Supreme Court· 2011-12-20· cited 787×
- State v. ArnettOhio Supreme Court· 2000-03-15· cited 630×
- State v. Neyland (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-05-08· cited 181×
- State v. BrimacombeOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-09-30· cited 96×
- Hook v. HookOhio Court of Appeals· 2010-09-03· cited 11×
- State v. ThebeauOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-12-19· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.