State v. Martin

Citations

• 2017 Ohio 763

Syllabus

After conducting an independent review of the record as required by Anders, we find no issues with arguable merit to present on appeal. Appellant's claim that she entered an uninformed guilty plea to her OVI offense as a result of having two different public defenders represent her in this case lacks arguable merit as Appellant had the same public defender throughout the plea process and did not receive a new public defender until the sentencing phase of the proceedings. In addition, the record establishes that the trial court complied with the requirements for accepting pleas to first-degree misdemeanor \petty offenses\ under Crim.R. 11(E). Affirmed.