State v. Martin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the exclusion of testimony did not violate the defendants' right to present a defense where the defendants testified as to their version of the events.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Folse
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1993-07-02· cited 43×
• State v. Corley
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1997-10-08· cited 27×
• State v. Nixon
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 2018-04-13· cited 24×
• State v. Anderson
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 2001-03-28· cited 16×
• State v. McBride
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 2000-11-15· cited 12×
• Joseph v. Williams
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 2012-11-14· cited 11×
• State v. Hill
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1992-12-09· cited 8×
• State v. Adams
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 2013-05-16· cited 8×
• State v. Zeno
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 2014-09-19· cited 7×
• State v. Galliano
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1994-06-24· cited 4×
• State v. Clark
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1996-03-06· cited 3×
• State v. Martin
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1991-11-01

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Delaware v. Van Arsdall
  Supreme Court· 1986-04-07· cited 7,102×
• State v. Gremillion
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1989-05-04· cited 86×
• State v. Batiste
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1978-10-09· cited 61×
• State v. Herrod
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1982-04-05· cited 39×
• State v. Lee
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1988-05-23· cited 28×
• State v. Baxter
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1978-04-11· cited 24×
• State v. Neal
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1989-08-23· cited 9×
• State v. Hall
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1970-03-30· cited 9×
• State v. Brady
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1987-04-14· cited 8×
• State v. Russland Enterprises, Inc.
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1989-04-11· cited 6×