Oregon Supreme Court· 3/4/1980
State v. Martin
Citations
- 607 P.2d 171
- 288 Or. 643
- 1980 Ore. LEXIS 751
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- consistent with principle announced in Turner, defendant whose conviction is set aside on his motion for a new trial cannot, on remand, be prosecuted for additional charges arising from the same criminal episode
- consistent with principle announced in Turner, defendant whose conviction is set aside on his motion for a new trial cannot, on remand, be prosecuted for additional charges arising from the same criminal episode
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Denecke, Holman, Tongue, Howell, Lent, Peterson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. TurnerOregon Supreme Court· 1967-06-21· cited 76×
- State v. WolfSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1966-01-24· cited 65×
- State Ex Rel. Dillavou v. FosterOregon Supreme Court· 1975-10-16· cited 10×
- State v. TurnerOregon Supreme Court· 1965-07-15· cited 7×
- State v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1979-05-14· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.