State v. Martin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “This court has taken the position that in a condemnation case such as this one, ‘any evidence which will aid the jury in fixing the fair market value of the property should be considered by them.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Dillingham Corp.
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1979-02-26· cited 26×
• Tax Appeal of Hawaii Prince Hotel Waikiki Corp. v. City & County of Honolulu
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1999-02-10· cited 9×
• State Ex Rel. Pai v. Kunimoto
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1980-09-24· cited 8×
• County of Hawaii v. Leeb
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1980-10-30
• HART v. Ward
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2023-12-29

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. 5139.5 Acres of Land, in Aiken and Barnwell Counties, S. C., Tract No. D-308
  Fourth Circuit· 1952-12-31· cited 88×
• International Paper Company v. United States
  Fifth Circuit· 1956-01-23· cited 86×
• United States v. 60.14 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situate in Warren and McKean Counties, State of Pennsylvania, and Arthur W. Seibel
  Third Circuit· 1966-06-24· cited 66×
• Territory of Hawaii v. Adelmeyer
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1961-07-19· cited 59×
• United States v. J. Cyril Johnson and Ray T. Lindsay
  Ninth Circuit· 1961-02-08· cited 55×
• Barretto v. Akau
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1969-12-11· cited 53×
• Tittle v. Hurlbutt
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1972-06-02· cited 30×
• State v. Heirs of Halemano Kapahi
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1964-10-01· cited 30×
• Powell v. Bartmess
  California Court of Appeal· 1956-02-23· cited 20×
• Collins v. Shishido
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1965-06-30· cited 13×