Supreme Court of Connecticut· 3/9/2010
State v. Marra
Citations
- 988 A.2d 865
- 295 Conn. 74
- 2010 Conn. LEXIS 66
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reasonable probability analysis requires that court take into account totality of evidence adduced at original trial in order to determine whether absence of exculpatory DNA evidence undermines confidence in verdict
- reasonable probability analysis requires court to take into account totality of evidence adduced at original trial in order to determine whether absence of exculpatory DNA evidence undermines confidence in verdict
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rogers, Norcott, Katz, Palmer, Vertefeuille, Zarella, McLachlan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. BarnesConnecticut Appellate Court· 2011-03-01· cited 10×
- State v. ButlerConnecticut Appellate Court· 2011-07-05· cited 5×
- State v. CoteConnecticut Appellate Court· 2011-07-05· cited 3×
- Lambert v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 2018-11-16· cited 3×
- State v. SmithConnecticut Appellate Court· 2026-05-05
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.