State v. Marks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the trial court erred in ordering restitution for a misdemeanor offense but affirming on grounds set forth in RCW 9.92.060(2) and RCW 9.95.210(2)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Snedden
  Washington Supreme Court· 2003-08-07· cited 25×
• State v. Haggard
  Washington Supreme Court· 2020-04-23· cited 21×
• City of Bremerton v. Bradshaw
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2004-04-27· cited 5×
• City of Bremerton v. Bradshaw
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2004-06-15· cited 3×
• State v. Ring
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2006-08-24

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Davison
  Washington Supreme Court· 1991-05-16· cited 161×
• State v. Hennings
  Washington Supreme Court· 1996-07-18· cited 101×
• State v. Collins
  Washington Supreme Court· 1988-03-10· cited 62×
• State v. Whitney
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1995-06-15· cited 22×
• State v. Marks
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1999-04-01· cited 12×
• State v. Soderholm
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1993-01-11· cited 6×