State v. Marks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• No specific intent \to evade the due course of justice\ need be proven in order to establish commission of crime of escape
• No specific intent “to evade the due course of justice” need be proven in order to establish commission of crime of escape

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Alex v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1971-04-26· cited 62×
• State v. Kjeldahl
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1979-03-23· cited 27×
• Helton v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1975-04-24· cited 14×
• State v. Rocque
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1983-03-02· cited 7×
• State v. White
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1972-03-15· cited 2×

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Haskins
  California Court of Appeal· 1960-01-11· cited 44×
• State v. Scott
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1951-12-13· cited 38×
• State v. Booton
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1962-10-19· cited 34×
• State v. Parish
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1957-05-02· cited 30×
• State v. Johnson
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1953-09-29· cited 29×
• State v. Wharff
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1965-05-04· cited 26×
• Riley v. State
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1843-07-15· cited 17×
• People v. Miller
  California Court of Appeal· 1961-10-09· cited 14×
• People v. Goldman
  California Court of Appeal· 1966-10-04· cited 11×
• State v. Browne
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1896-04-02· cited 11×
• State v. Leckenby
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1967-06-06· cited 7×
• Wiggins v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1923-10-11· cited 6×
• Lewis v. People
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1966-03-21· cited 5×