State v. Marknsen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that Rule 65 “does not require the presentation of oral testimony” particularly “when the issues litigated are primarily questions of law”
• affirming a district court’s finding that a wireless provider’s delayed entry into a market and resulting loss of customers constituted an irreparable harm
• Rule 65 “does not require the presentation of oral testimony ... particularly ... when the issues litigated are primarily questions of law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).