State v. Marek
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 2044
Syllabus
Child endangering R.C. 2919.22 tampering with evidence R.C. 2921.12 failure to report a crime R.C. 2921.22. There was sufficient evidence to support appellant's convictions for child endangering and tampering with evidence when the evidence showed that appellant knew about the hidden camera her husband used to video record her minor child, failed in her duty to protect her child from her husband, and deleted or worked with others to delete the videos her husband had taken of her child. Her conviction for child endangering was also not against the manifest weight of the evidence. There is no spousal privilege in the child endangering statute, and appellant was not charged with a failure to report a crime.
Judges: O'Sullivan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court· 1991-07-31· cited 11,342×
- State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court· 1967-05-31· cited 7,146×
- State v. AwanOhio Supreme Court· 1986-02-19· cited 1,385×
- State v. WilsonOhio Supreme Court· 2007-05-23· cited 1,198×
- State v. MetzOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-10-03· cited 26×
- State v. GoinsOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-04-15· cited 13×
- State v. MaldonadoOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-12-10· cited 11×
- State v. GreenleeOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-03-30· cited 9×
- State v. KloftaOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-10-23· cited 6×
- State v. CroweOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-04-18· cited 4×
- State v. PittmanOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-02-03· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.