Skip to main content

State v. March

Citations

  • 130 S.W.3d 746
  • 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 448
  • 2004 WL 612764

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the dismissal of the one count charged in a multi-count indictment constituted “a final, appealable judgment [because] it purport[ed] to preclude any further prosecution on that charge”
  • holding that defendant’s mere status as a process server did not entitle him to the application of the exemption unless the defendant also demonstrated that he was acting as a process server at the time of the alleged crime

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ahrens, Crandall, Mooney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.