Supreme Court of New Jersey· 6/24/1957
State v. Manney
Citations
- 133 A.2d 313
- 24 N.J. 571
- 1957 N.J. LEXIS 210
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding stenographer in grand jury room during deliberations did not procedurally taint grand jury process
- dismissal not warranted in the absence of actual prejudice
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wachenfeld
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2010-12-10· cited 227×
- People Ex Rel. Sears v. RomitiIllinois Supreme Court· 1971-12-17· cited 47×
- State v. HartNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1976-03-04· cited 34×
- State v. GrazianiNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1959-06-29· cited 32×
- State v. SimonNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2011-04-12· cited 22×
- State v. McCormickCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1968-06-18· cited 20×
- United States v. LillS.D. West Virginia· 1980-08-15· cited 12×
- State v. MurphyNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1986-11-06· cited 9×
- State v. Ciba-Geigy Corp.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1988-01-20· cited 9×
- State v. GrantNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2003-06-25· cited 7×
- State v. RosengardSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1966-05-23· cited 6×
- In re Essex County Grand Jury Investigation into the Fire at Seton Hall UniversityNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2003-03-28· cited 5×
- State v. SivoNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2000-04-12· cited 2×
- In Re Monday Grand Jury PanelNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2009-01-14
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. GarssonS.D. New York· 1923-02-01· cited 118×
- United States v. SmythN.D. California· 1952-02-20· cited 86×
- United States v. Amazon Industrial Chemical CorporationD. Maryland· 1931-12-23· cited 85×
- Latham v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1915-10-04· cited 72×
- Hale v. United StatesEighth Circuit· 1928-03-27· cited 38×
- United States v. CarperDistrict of Columbia· 1953-11-24· cited 34×
- United States v. HeinzeS.D. New York· 1910-01-22· cited 33×
- Wilkes v. United StatesSixth Circuit· 1923-06-29· cited 29×
- Wilson v. United StatesSecond Circuit· 1916-01-05· cited 14×
- Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1950-05-11· cited 12×
- State v. CanatellaSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1950-04-04· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.