Court of Appeals of Utah· 12/12/2013
State v. Mangum
Citations
- 318 P.3d 250
- 2013 UT App 292
- 749 Utah Adv. Rep. 27
- 2013 WL 6504366
- 2013 Utah App. LEXIS 298
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]here was no requirement to show specific intent in order to support [conviction for third-degree aggravated assault].”
- “[T]here was no requirement to show specific intent in order to support [conviction for third-degree aggravated assault].”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Mehugh, Orme, Roth
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. WorkmanUtah Supreme Court· 1993-04-30· cited 89×
- State v. FedorowiczUtah Supreme Court· 2002-07-19· cited 78×
- State v. HutchingsUtah Supreme Court· 2012-08-10· cited 37×
- State v. GardnerUtah Supreme Court· 2007-08-28· cited 11×
- State v. LuceroCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2012-07-19· cited 9×
- State v. EkstromCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2013-11-15· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.