Skip to main content
· 12/22/1993

State v. Mandicino

Citations

  • 509 N.W.2d 481
  • 1993 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 262
  • 1993 WL 527363

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “an impediment to a court’s authority can be obviated by consent, waiver, or estoppel”
  • explaining the distinction between a court’s subject matter jurisdiction and authority to hear a particular case.
  • distinguishing subject matter jurisdiction from authority to hear a case and stating the latter may be waived if not raised
  • distinguishing subject matter jurisdiction from authority to hear a case and stating the latter may be waived if not raised
  • explaining the difference between subject matter jurisdiction and the court’s authority to entertain a particular case
  • elaborating on the distinction between “authority” and “jurisdiction,” and discussing consent, waiver, and estoppel in that context

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harris, Lavorato, Neuman, Snell, Andreasen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.