State v. Malloy
Citations
- 2026 Ohio 14
Syllabus
Repeat-Violent-Offender Specification; R.C. 2924.149; Ineffective Assistance of Counsel; Evid.R. 611(A); Constitutional Right to Testify. The trial court did not err by determining the defendant-appellant's status as a repeat violent offender after the jury found him guilty of the underlying criminal charge. The defendant-appellant's trial counsel was not was not ineffective because the trial court reasonably controlled the mode and manner of the presentation of evidence of the defendant-appellant's prior convictions. Nothing in the record suggests that the defendant-appellant wished to testify and was denied the opportunity to do so.
Judges: Zimmerman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2005-03-07· cited 4,574×
- State v. BeyOhio Supreme Court· 1999-05-19· cited 451×
- State v. HunterOhio Supreme Court· 2009-08-25· cited 38×
- State v. OllerOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-03-07· cited 10×
- State v. WolfeOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-03-14· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.