State v. Mallett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “When a hearsay statement includes within it additional hearsay, each layer of hearsay must conform with an exception-to-the-hearsay rule in order to be admissible at trial.”
• “Lieutenant Rossiter’s medical training, coupled with his observations about the victim’s condition and the blood’s still being wet, provides more than enough facts to conclude that his testimony [concerning the time of death] was rationally based upon his perceptions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Lynch
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 2004-08-12· cited 102×
• State v. Oliveira
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 2001-07-06· cited 54×
• State v. Barrett
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 2001-04-06· cited 23×
• Massie v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1998-05-26· cited 21×
• State v. Wilding
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 1999-11-09· cited 8×
• In re Emilee K. In re Jennifer K
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 2017-02-06· cited 7×
• State v. Greene
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 1999-01-12· cited 5×
• State v. Elliott
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 2001-01-10· cited 1×
• State v. Daniel E. Doyle, Jr.
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 2020-07-08
• State v. Louis Seignious
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 2024-07-25

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Von Bulow
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 1984-05-24· cited 77×
• State v. Grundy
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 1990-11-21· cited 55×
• State v. Robalewski
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 1980-07-28· cited 52×
• State v. Fogarty
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 1981-08-27· cited 38×
• State v. Welch
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 1975-01-15· cited 11×
• Clark v. Ellerthorpe
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 1989-01-30· cited 7×