State v. Maldonado

Citations

• 21 Wash. 653
• 59 P. 489
• 1899 Wash. LEXIS 345

Syllabus

<p>CRIMINAL LAW-SUFFICIENCY OF INFORMATION.</p> <p>The fact that defendant’s name is omitted in the first part of an information will not render it fatally defective, if in another part of the information he is charged by name with having committed the acts which constitute the crime charged, since he is thereby sufficiently informed to enable him to intelligently prepare his defense.</p> <p>SAME — APPEAL—SUFFICIENCY OF EVIDENCE.</p> <p>Where there is sufficient evidence in a criminal prosecution, if uncontradicted, to warrant a verdict of guilty, such a verdict will not be disturbed, when the evidence is contradictory, although the appellate court may not be wholly satisfied with the sufficiency of the evidence.</p>