State v. Major

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Determining the intent of the defendant should be left to the trier of fact and is therefore not the proper subject of a motion to dismiss.”
• “Determining the intent of the defendant should be left to the trier of fact and is therefore not the proper subject of a motion to dismiss.” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Anthony Costanzo v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-12-03· cited 4×
• State v. Flansbaum-Talabisco
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-07-24· cited 3×
• State v. Wright
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-07-27· cited 1×
• State v. Barnes
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-04-29
• Reinlein v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-12-16
• T.R.W., A CHILD v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2023-02-15

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Kalogeropolous
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2000-05-11· cited 56×
• State v. Hinkle
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-11-28· cited 35×
• State v. Santiago
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-09-27· cited 14×
• State v. Lebron
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-03-16· cited 10×
• C.K. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-02-23· cited 6×
• E.I. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-12-30· cited 5×
• State v. Covington
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-10-17· cited 4×