Court of Appeals of Washington· 4/22/1992

State v. Mail

Citations

828 P.2d 70
65 Wash. App. 295
1992 Wash. App. LEXIS 165

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

describing departure as an “option” if aggravating factors present
describing departure as an “option” if aggravating factors present

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Seinfeld

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

State v. Mail
Washington Supreme Court· 1993-06-17· cited 129×
State v. Hanf
Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2004-10-19· cited 5×
State v. Saue
Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2004-11-02· cited 4×
State v. Rocha
Court of Appeals of Washington· 2014-06-17· cited 1×
State of Washington v. Michael Joe Rocha
Court of Appeals of Washington· 2014-06-17

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

State v. Ammons
Washington Supreme Court· 2005-06-08· cited 422×
State v. Rienks
Court of Appeals of Washington· 1987-01-14· cited 25×
State v. Hall
Court of Appeals of Washington· 1986-10-06· cited 9×
State v. Ward
Court of Appeals of Washington· 1987-10-12· cited 6×
State v. Andrews
Court of Appeals of Washington· 1986-02-27· cited 5×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.