State v. Maher
Citations
- 2017 Ohio 7807
Syllabus
Although the trial court abused its discretion in not striking a crash reconstructionist expert's testimony, the error was harmless. Trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting into evidence photographs showing regulatory violations found on the truck and trailer operated by the defendant. Defendant did not receive ineffective assistance of counsel when trial counsel failed to exclude crash reconstructionist expert's testimony or object to the introduction of photographs showing regulatory violations found on the truck and trailer operated by the defendant.
Judges: M. Powell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.