· 4/3/1992
State v. Maggard
Citations
- 829 P.2d 591
- 16 Kan. App. 2d 743
- 1992 Kan. App. LEXIS 333
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that K.S.A. 60-455 evidence was relevant because the identity of the defendant was an element of the crime
- 180-day period began when the defendant was returned from county jail to state prison where he was serving a sentence as a result of parole violations
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Briscoe, Elliott, Lewis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.