Skip to main content

State v. Maestas

Citations

  • 113 Or. App. 744
  • 833 P.2d 1348
  • 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 1350

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • even if court had discretion to reach unpreserved error because it was apparent on the face of the record, court would not review that error because defendant’s failure to preserve was a tactical decision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Deits, Joseph, Richardson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.