State v. Madsen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• under A.R.S. § 13-1410, determination whether the accused acted with an unnatural or abnormal sexual interest must be objectively made on the basis of community standards; actual intent need not be proved

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Pima County Juvenile Appeal No. 74802-2
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1990-04-04· cited 57×
• May v. Ryan
  D. Arizona· 2017-03-28· cited 23×
• United States v. J.D. Todd
  Ninth Circuit· 1992-05-19· cited 15×
• Flink v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1984-05-11· cited 15×
• In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JV-121430
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1992-10-08· cited 12×
• State of Arizona v. Jerry Charles Holle
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2015-09-16· cited 10×
• State v. Cardenas
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1985-07-25· cited 1×
• Bieganski v. Shinn
  Ninth Circuit· 2025-08-12

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Berry
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1966-10-19· cited 74×
• State v. Trenary
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1955-11-22· cited 16×
• State v. Anderson
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1980-12-30· cited 8×