State v. Madrid

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[b]urglary may be distin guished from the crime of theft and shoplifting in that the intent to commit a theft or any felony must be formed at the time of entry ”
• “[b]urglary may be distinguished from the crime of theft and shoplifting in that the intent to commit a theft or any felony must be formed at the time of entry ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Louk
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1981-12-18· cited 73×
• State v. Mahoe
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1998-12-14· cited 41×
• State v. Van Dyke
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1980-10-27· cited 21×
• State v. Parker
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1977-07-14· cited 19×
• State v. Wilson
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1982-10-21· cited 9×
• State v. Ware
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1976-10-05· cited 8×
• State v. Pogue
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1976-11-01· cited 7×
• State v. Way
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1981-06-24· cited 2×
• State v. Mahoe
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1998-09-01· cited 1×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Jorn
  Supreme Court· 1971-01-25· cited 2,215×
• State v. Villavicencio
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1964-01-08· cited 80×
• State v. Hutton
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1960-02-10· cited 42×
• In Re the Appeal in Marcopa County, Juvenile Action No. J-75755
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1974-07-03· cited 32×
• State v. Moore
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1972-11-22· cited 24×
• State v. Collins
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1974-11-29· cited 19×
• McCreary v. State
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1923-02-06· cited 18×
• State v. Albe
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1969-11-04· cited 14×
• State v. Ramirez
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1975-03-31· cited 7×
• State v. Verde
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1969-10-24· cited 4×