State v. MacDonald

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no prejudice when defendant merely argued \peremptory challenges are very valuable\ and was prevented from \exercising his peremptory challenges to his best advantage\
• finding no prejudice when defendant merely argued \peremptory challenges are very valuable\ and was prevented from \exercising his peremptory challenges to his best advantage\
• finding no prejudice when defendant merely argued “peremptory challenges are very valuable” and was prevented from “exercising his peremptory challenges to his best advantage”
• finding no prejudice when defendant merely argued “peremptory challenges are very valuable” and was prevented from “exercising his peremptory challenges to his best advantage”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Bible
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1993-08-12· cited 658×
• State v. Deddens
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1975-11-25· cited 43×
• State v. Eddington
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2010-12-17· cited 21×
• State v. Vasquez
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1981-09-23· cited 16×
• State of Arizona v. Douglas Lee Eddington
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2010-12-17

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• State v. Wadsworth
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1973-01-19· cited 21×