Ohio Court of Appeals· 8/29/2022
State v. Mabe
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 2996
Syllabus
The trial court properly imposed consecutive sentences under R.C. 2929.14(C)(4). Defendant-appellant's sentence is not contrary to law because the Reagan Tokes Act is not unconstitutional.
Judges: Zimmerman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
- State v. Bonnell (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-07-24· cited 1,841×
- State v. HackerOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-10-26· cited 120×
- State v. HitesOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-04-30· cited 116×
- State v. PowerOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-09-23· cited 70×
- State v. WolfeOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-11-30· cited 70×
- State v. PeddicordOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-08-05· cited 49×
- State v. MaddoxOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-04-22· cited 38×
- State v. HughesOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-03-04· cited 33×
- State v. AdamsOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-04-29· cited 24×
- State v. FieldsOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-02-23· cited 18×
- State v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals· 2010-09-27· cited 14×
- State v. CervantesOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-07-25· cited 11×
- State v. CriswellOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-07-18· cited 6×
- State v. RayOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-04-11· cited 5×
- State v. BassOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-09-29· cited 4×
- State v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-12-28· cited 4×
- State v. LoughOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-01-29· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.