State v. M. T.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• assuming preservation excused when there was no effect on the court’s disposition
• assuming preservation excused when there was no effect on the court’s disposition

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Dept. of Human Services v. H. C.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-10-22· cited 3×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Wyatt
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2000-12-01· cited 659×
• State v. Vanornum
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2013-12-27· cited 546×
• Peeples v. Lampert
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2008-08-14· cited 389×
• State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. Geist
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1990-08-07· cited 234×
• Krummacher v. Gierloff
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1981-04-21· cited 232×
• Department of Human Services v. T. L.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2016-03-03· cited 43×
• Miller v. Baldwin
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-09-12· cited 17×
• State v. Maletta
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1989-10-11· cited 7×
• State v. Linder
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-10-31· cited 4×
• Lopez v. Cain
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-04-03· cited 2×
• Stokes v. Cain
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-09-16· cited 2×