Skip to main content

State v. M. M.

Citations

  • 163 W. Va. 235
  • 256 S.E.2d 549
  • 1979 W. Va. LEXIS 391

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • remarking that even testimony by qualified experts is inadmissible where opinions are “not founded on a sufficient knowledge of [the subject’s] background”
  • remarking that even testimony by qualified experts is inadmissible where opinions are “not founded on a sufficient knowledge of [the subject’s] background”
  • “limited and superficial contact” with subject area failed to evidence requisite “significant skill and knowledge” required to testify as an expert
  • “limited and superficial contact” with subject area failed to evidence requisite “significant skill and knowledge” required 17 to testify as an expert

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McGraw

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.