Skip to main content

State v. Lykins

Citations

  • 2022 Ohio 3935

Syllabus

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW/CRIMINAL — SPEEDY TRIAL — COUNSEL The trial court did not err by denying defendant's pro se motion to dismiss based on a speedy-trial violation where the defendant was represented by counsel at the time of the filing and counsel did not join in the motion. The trial court did not violate defendant's speedy-trial rights where the trial court accepted defendant's no-contest pleas and found him within the statutory time limit, and, therefore trial counsel was not ineffective in failing to raise the speedy-trial issue in the trial court.

Judges: Bock

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.