State v. Lykins
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 3935
Syllabus
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW/CRIMINAL — SPEEDY TRIAL — COUNSEL The trial court did not err by denying defendant's pro se motion to dismiss based on a speedy-trial violation where the defendant was represented by counsel at the time of the filing and counsel did not join in the motion. The trial court did not violate defendant's speedy-trial rights where the trial court accepted defendant's no-contest pleas and found him within the statutory time limit, and, therefore trial counsel was not ineffective in failing to raise the speedy-trial issue in the trial court.
Judges: Bock
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- State v. MadrigalOhio Supreme Court· 2000-01-05· cited 1,280×
- State v. Adams (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2015-10-01· cited 375×
- State v. SanchezOhio Supreme Court· 2006-09-13· cited 143×
- State v. PalmerOhio Supreme Court· 1998-12-09· cited 61×
- State v. LunaOhio Supreme Court· 1982-12-22· cited 18×
- State v. MangoOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-05-12· cited 16×
- State v. CastagnolaOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-04-25· cited 7×
- State v. GageOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-12-08· cited 6×
- State v. OjileOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-08-27· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.