State v. Luther

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• no communication for immoral purpose if underlying sexual conduct not illegal
• no communication for immoral purpose if underlying sexual conduct not illegal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• CJC v. Corporation of Catholic Bishop
  Washington Supreme Court· 1999-09-08· cited 192×
• C.J.C. v. Corporation of Catholic Bishop
  Washington Supreme Court· 1999-07-29· cited 180×
• Ireneo P. Parrilla v. Alberto R. Gonzales , Attorney General
  Ninth Circuit· 2005-07-11· cited 135×
• State v. Spencer
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1994-07-25· cited 18×
• State v. Pietrzak
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2000-04-13· cited 12×
• C.J.C. v. Corporation of Catholic Bishop
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1997-09-22· cited 5×
• Parrilla v. Gonzales
  Ninth Circuit· 2005-07-11
• State Of Washington v. Eugene Andrew Young & Claude Hutchinson
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2016-03-01

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Gore
  Washington Supreme Court· 1984-04-26· cited 316×
• State v. Hall
  Washington Supreme Court· 1981-04-23· cited 95×
• State v. Claborn
  Washington Supreme Court· 1981-05-21· cited 77×
• State v. Spino
  Washington Supreme Court· 1963-01-17· cited 65×
• State v. Schimmelpfennig
  Washington Supreme Court· 1979-05-03· cited 61×
• State v. Day
  Washington Supreme Court· 1981-12-24· cited 57×
• State v. Browet, Inc.
  Washington Supreme Court· 1984-12-06· cited 45×
• Ketcham v. King County Medical Service Corp.
  Washington Supreme Court· 1972-11-16· cited 25×
• State v. Adlington-Kelly
  Washington Supreme Court· 1981-07-30· cited 23×
• State v. Danforth
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1989-12-04· cited 10×