State v. Lusk

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[o]rdinarily where objections to questions or evidence by a party are sustained by the trial court during the trial and the jury instructed not to consider such matter, it will not constitute reversible error”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Reed v. Wimmer
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1995-10-27· cited 75×
• State v. Ayers
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1988-04-01· cited 14×
• Hicks v. Ghaphery
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 2002-07-02· cited 9×
• State v. MAHOOD
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 2010-10-14· cited 6×
• State v. Catlett
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 2000-07-20· cited 5×
• M. Salim Ratnani v. Thoracis and Cardiovascular Assoc.
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 2013-11-22
• State of West Virginia v. Delbert R.
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 2015-06-22
• State of West Virginia v. Evan Lee Hersman
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 2021-02-02

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Strickland v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
• State v. Hamric
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1966-07-15· cited 107×
• State v. Boyd
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1981-07-13· cited 50×
• State v. Clark
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1982-06-23· cited 31×
• State v. Bragg
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1977-03-29· cited 27×
• Acord v. Hedrick
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1986-03-11· cited 17×