State v. Lunstad

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a witness’s statements were not admissible under state rule 801(d)(1)(B) “because such statements were not made prior to the time [the witness’s] alleged motive to fabricate arose.”
• holding that a witness's statements were not admissible under state rule 801(d)(1)(B) \because such statements were not made prior to the time [the witness's] alleged motive to fabricate arose.\
• all finding trial court erred in admitting prior consistent statements that did not meet limiting criteria of Rule 801(d)(1)(B)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).