State v. Lundgren

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he final judgment on whether a plea bargain shall be accepted must rest with the trial judge.”
• “[T]he acceptance or rejection of a plea bargain is within the sound discretion of the trial judge”
• “the acceptance or rejection of a plea bargain is within the sound discretion of the trial judge”
• “the acceptance or rejection of a plea bargain is within the sound discretion of the trial judge”
• \Whether the refusal to accept the plea bargain constitutes an abuse of discretion is a legal issue subject to appeal and is not grounds to sustain an affidavit of disqualification\
• judge’s rejection of proposed plea bargain does not suggest bias or prejudgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Elliott
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-02-17· cited 20×
• State v. Roby
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-01-28· cited 8×
• In re Disqualification of Spon
  Ohio Supreme Court· 2012-04-12· cited 5×
• State v. Frazier
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-04-26· cited 5×
• State v. Gonzalez
  Ohio Supreme Court· 1996-04-01· cited 3×
• State v. Masters
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-05-16· cited 2×
• State v. Jenkins
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-04-08· cited 1×
• State v. Chebegwen (In re Adkins)
  Ohio Supreme Court· 2018-09-20· cited 1×
• In re Y.S.
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-02-28