State v. Lundberg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming the imposition of multiple sentences where two victims, one a person and one a business, suffered loss as a result of the defendant’s thefts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Lattimer
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2001-02-27· cited 11×
• State v. Johnson
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2002-11-26· cited 11×
• State v. Bertsch
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2004-11-30· cited 5×
• State v. Angotti
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2001-09-11· cited 2×
• State v. Morris
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2000-04-18· cited 2×

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Kindem
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1981-12-07· cited 267×
• State v. Cole
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1996-01-05· cited 83×
• State v. Adams
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-06-27· cited 82×
• State v. Bookwalter
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1995-12-08· cited 63×
• State v. Norris
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1988-08-05· cited 61×
• State v. Jones
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1984-04-20· cited 57×
• State Ex Rel. Stangvik v. Tahash
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1968-09-13· cited 39×
• State v. Eaton
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-04-11· cited 38×
• State v. Williams
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1983-08-12· cited 27×
• State v. Hodges
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1986-05-09· cited 26×
• State v. Armstrong
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1960-02-11· cited 26×
• State v. Harris
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1987-05-01· cited 25×
• State v. Schneider
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1987-03-20· cited 24×
• State v. Gartland
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1983-03-18· cited 22×
• State v. Wipper
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1994-02-11· cited 9×