New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 7/18/1991
State v. Lugo
Citations
- 592 A.2d 1234
- 249 N.J. Super. 565
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \a defendant operating an automobile known by him to have been stolen has no reasonable expectation of privacy resp ecting contraband he had hidden in it-no matter how the contraband is packaged.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judges Brody and Dreier
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. HarrisNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1997-03-18· cited 19×
- State v. De La PazNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2001-02-16· cited 18×
- State v. BohukNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1994-01-21· cited 15×
- Bruce v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2001-09-13· cited 14×
- State v. SmithNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1996-06-14· cited 11×
- State v. AriasNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1992-06-16· cited 10×
- State of New Jersey v. Dqwan A. TaylorNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2015-05-12· cited 5×
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. ChadwickSupreme Court· 1977-06-21· cited 2,561×
- Arkansas v. SandersSupreme Court· 1979-06-20· cited 1,484×
- California v. AcevedoSupreme Court· 1991-06-03· cited 1,409×
- State v. OgarNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1989-01-03· cited 38×
- State v. ToddNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1990-02-06· cited 29×
- State v. PaceNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1979-10-31· cited 17×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.