State v. Ludwig

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining the original purpose and single subject requirements were designed to prevent enactment of legislation that may deceive legislators or the public regarding its effect
• explaining the original purpose and single subject requirements were designed to prevent enactment of legislation that may deceive legislators or the public regarding its effect

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Akin v. Director of Revenue
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1996-11-19· cited 43×
• Westin Crown Plaza Hotel Co. v. King
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1984-02-15· cited 42×
• State Ex Rel. Voss v. Davis
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1967-09-11· cited 40×
• Bullington v. State
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1970-11-09· cited 35×
• Blue Cross Hospital Service, Inc. of Missouri v. Frappier
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1984-12-18· cited 27×
• State Ex Rel. Hall v. Vaughn
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1972-07-19· cited 17×
• Missouri State Medical Ass'n v. Missouri Department of Health
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2001-03-20· cited 14×
• Brown-Forman Distillers Corp. v. McHenry
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1978-04-24· cited 13×
• State Ex Rel. Toedebusch Transfer, Inc. v. Public Service Commission
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1975-02-10· cited 13×
• State Ex Rel. Normandy School District of St. Louis County v. Small
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1962-04-09· cited 12×
• Felker v. Carpenter
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1960-12-12· cited 11×
• Rottjakob v. Leachman
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1975-04-14· cited 5×
• Engleman v. City of Dearborn
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1976-11-29· cited 5×
• Kirkpatrick v. Rose
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1961-02-13· cited 4×
• Opinion No. 153-80 (1980)
  Missouri Attorney General Reports· 1980-11-07
• Ronald J. Calzone v. Interim Commissioner of the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Roger Dorson, in his Official Capacity, and Ronald J. Calzone v. Director of the Missouri Department of Agriculture Chris Chinn, in her Official Capacity
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2019-10-01

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State ex rel. Scotland County v. Ewing
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1893-05-22· cited 16×
• State ex rel. Shannon County v. Hawkins
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1902-10-27· cited 15×
• Hethcock v. Crawford County
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1906-12-22· cited 13×
• State ex rel. Lawrence County v. Shipman
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1894-12-18· cited 12×
• State ex rel. Kirkwood v. Heege
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1896-06-23· cited 10×
• State ex rel. Barker v. Scott
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1917-02-20· cited 8×
• State ex rel. Preisler v. Toberman
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1954-07-12· cited 6×