State v. Lucien

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that coincident tim- ing and uncontested § 8(a)(1) violations was sufficient evi- dence to support Board’s finding
• \[B]oth direct and circumstantial evidence\ of such factors may be used to establish employer's unlawful motive
• “The timing of the layoff, just two weeks before the scheduled union election, gives further credence to the charge of anti-union animus.”
• “The timing of the layoff, just two weeks before the scheduled union election, gives further credence to the charge of anti-union animus.”
• “The timing of the layoff, just two weeks before the scheduled union election, gives further credence to the charge of anti-union animus.”
• “The timing of the layoff, just two weeks before the scheduled union election, gives further credence to the charge of anti-union animus.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).