State v. Lucero

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that comparability was not satisfied when the defendant “did not ‘affirmatively acknowledge’ that his California convictions were comparable to Washington crimes.”
• \A defendant's affirmative acknowledgment of his offender score does not relieve the State of its burden of proving the comparability of out-of-state offenses.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Mercado
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2014-06-05· cited 45×
• State v. Arndt
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2014-02-04· cited 38×
• State of Washington v. Joseph Andrew Richmond
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2018-05-01· cited 15×
• State Of Washington, V Raymond U. Arndt, Jr.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2014-02-04
• State of Washington v. Heather L. Mercado
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2014-06-05
• State Of Washington, V. Robert Terrance Jackson Jr.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2023-11-06

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Mendoza
  Washington Supreme Court· 2009-04-16· cited 114×
• State v. Jackson
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2005-08-16· cited 25×
• State v. Lucero
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2009-09-14· cited 11×
• State v. Lucero
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2007-09-17· cited 3×
• State v. Lucero
  Washington Supreme Court· 2009-07-08· cited 2×