State v. Lucca

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the defendant’s fingerprint on the window of the burglarized home was sufficient to support a burglary conviction because the outside of the window was not generally accessible to the public or the defendant
• affirming burglary conviction based on the defendant’s fingerprint on a piece of broken glass because there was no evidence that defendant had been to the residence before the burglary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).