Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1/21/1999
State v. Lucas
Citations
- 589 N.W.2d 91
- 1999 WL 30643
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that doctrine of in pari materia is not used absent statutory ambiguity
- “Because neither statute is ambiguously worded, we have no need to use the doctrine of in pari materia in this instance.”
- “The doctrine of (Footnote continued on next page.) D-6 The State contends that interpreting section 351.02(4
- “The doctrine of in pari materia is a tool of statutory interpretation that allows two statutes with common purposes and subject matter to be construed together to determine the meaning of ambiguous statutory language.”
- \The doctrine of in pari materia is a tool of statutory interpretation that allows two statutes with common purposes and subject matter to be construed together to determine the meaning of ambiguous statutory language.\
- “The doctrine of in pari materia is a tool of statutory interpretation that allows two statutes with common purposes and subject matter to be construed together to determine the 6 meaning of ambiguous statutory language.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gilbert, Anderson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. ThonesavanhSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2017-09-06· cited 107×
- State v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2014-02-12· cited 65×
- State v. LeathersSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2011-07-20· cited 57×
- U.S. Bank N. A. v. Cold Spring Granite Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2011-09-07· cited 46×
- State of Minnesota v. Jaimiah Lamar IrbySupreme Court of Minnesota· 2014-07-02· cited 16×
- In Re the Estate of JothamSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2006-10-12· cited 11×
- Troyer v. Vertlu Management Co./Kok & Lundberg Funeral HomesSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2011-08-17· cited 11×
- In Re the Welfare of the Children of N.F.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2008-05-30· cited 10×
- State v. HormannCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2011-10-19· cited 10×
- State v. KoperskiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2000-06-06· cited 9×
- State v. OverwegSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2019-01-23· cited 5×
- State v. BowenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2018-04-02· cited 3×
- State of Minnesota v. Minnesota School of Business, Inc. d/b/a Minnesota School of BusinessCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2016-09-12· cited 1×
- Minnesota Joint Underwriting Ass'n v. Star Tribune Media Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2014-06-09· cited 1×
- State of Minnesota v. Lisa Dawn OliverSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2025-12-10
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. MurphySupreme Court of Minnesota· 1996-04-12· cited 128×
- Phelps v. Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1995-09-08· cited 77×
- State v. McKownSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1991-09-20· cited 42×
- State v. EdrozoSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1998-05-14· cited 36×
- State v. FiebkeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1996-10-22· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.