Skip to main content

State v. Lowell

Citations

  • 179 N.E.3d 676
  • 2021 Ohio 3098

Syllabus

Not guilty by reason of insanity, consecutive commitments, R.C. 2945.40, R.C. 2945.401(J)(1)(b). Trial court erred in running civil commitments consecutively under R.C. 2945.401(J) where the plain language of the statute does not provide for consecutive civil commitments. R.C. 2945.401(J) defines the length of the trial court's jurisdiction not the term of the insanity acquittee's commitment. An insanity acquittee's commitment is solely defined by whether they remain a mentally ill person subject to court order as defined in R.C. 5122.01(B). Further, R.C. 2929.14(C)(4) has no application in the civil commitment context.

Judges: Groves

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.