State v. Lovely

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• vacating a judgment where the court rejected defendant’s voir dire question without inquiring about the reason for which it was requested
• vacating a judgment where the court rejected defendant's voir dire question without inquiring about the reason for which it was requested
• vacating the court’s judgment where the court denied the defendant's request for voir dire aimed at a type of bias that was directly intertwined with the charges alleged against him and failed to develop factual circumstances about the request prior to making a judgment
• acknowledging the undeniable “stigmatization of homosexuals in our society” and concluding that the trial court was required to inquire about anti-gay bias during jury voir dire when the evidence suggested that the defendant had been a patron of a gay bar
• acknowledging the undeniable “stigmatization of homosexuals in our society” and concluding that the trial court was required to inquire about anti-gay bias during jury voir dire when the evidence suggested that the defendant had been a patron of a gay bar

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).